SYSML2_ — Ordering of guards and accepts in transitions is inconsistent

The fourth and sixth rows of "Table 16. States – Representative Notation" each give an example of a transition statement that contains both an if statement and an accept statement, with the accept before the if.

...
transition
   first state1
   accept trigger1
   if guard1
...

However, page 110 and the subsequent examples seem to contradict this:

A transition usage can also have an accepter, which is an accept action usage use to trigger the transition. The accepter action for a transition usage is placed after the guard expression and notated using the accept keyword, with its payload and receiver parameters specified exactly as discussed in 7.16.8 .

If an accept before an if has a different meaning than an if before accept, the specification document does not make this obvious.
The Jupyter Kernel in release 2024-05 of the SysML-v2-Release repository treats an if before an accept as a syntax error.