-
Key: SYSML16-37
-
Legacy Issue Number: 13342
-
Status: closed
-
Source: NIST ( Mr. Conrad Bock)
-
Summary:
In Allocations, AllocateActivityPartition, Constraints, the second paragraph says the AllocateActivityPartition stereotype does nopt preserve the semantics of of UML 2 ActivityPartition, and that partitions with AllocateActivityPartition do not have responsibility for invoking the actions in them. I think there is no conflict with UML 2 semantics, because UML 2 ActivityPartition only requires performing the actions to be the responsibility of the element represented by the partiion, not the invoking of the action. This seems compatible with allocation.
-
Reported: SysML 1.1 — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Deferred — SysML 1.6
-
Disposition Summary:
Defer
Postponed to the next RTF
-
Updated: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:17 GMT
SYSML16 — AllocateActivityPartition and UML 2 semantics
- Key: SYSML16-37
- OMG Task Force: SysML 1.6 RTF