-
Key: SOAML11-1
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15135
-
Status: open
-
Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mr. James J. Odell)
-
Summary:
Subject: FW: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:35:37 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
thread-index: AcrCGzfTouMfZVwkYEGlviuBN+fz/AAAZoigAACYR7EAAxmX4AAAEg7w
From: "Cory Casanave" <cory-c@modeldriven.com>
To: <soaml-ftf@omg.org>Note that there is a wrong figure in the document, see below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Cory Casanave
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:35 PM
To: 'James Odell'
Cc: Ed Seidewitz
Subject: RE: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bisThe first figure should be:
However the doc numbers don’t match - the FTF report doc is 09-11-14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: James Odell email@jamesodell.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:04 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: Re: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bisIn the downlodable doc, it’s Figs 15 and 16; on SoaML.docx, it Figs 17 and 18.
-Jim
On 3/12/10 2:48 PM, "Cory Casanave" indited:
Jim,
Which document are you looking at ? In SoaML.docx this is not figure a6.
-Cory--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: James Odell email@jamesodell.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2Cory,
Sorry, I included the wrong images on the last one.
Now, Figs 15 and 16 are identical, but the text describing Fig 16 does not jibe with figure. Can you tell me what Fig 16 should look like?Thanks,
Jim
Real Fig. 15
Real Fig. 16
-
Reported: SoaML 1.0 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT