-
Key: SEC16-3
-
Legacy Issue Number: 2344
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: As we realized during the RTF 1.5, we have erroneous text for
operations that describe passing nil/NULL for parameters. I"ve
tracked down a few more:p. 15-96 [495]: For the requested_privileges parameter, the phrase "(A
null attribute set requests default attributes.)" should read "A
zero length attribute list requests the default attributes."p. 15-130 [666]: For the data_included_in_token parameter, the phrase
"(may be null)" should read "(may be a zero length sequence)".p. 15-156 [784]: The object_type (which is a repository id) parameter
is allowed to be nil. It should read "If this is the empty string,
all types are implied."p. 15-157 [787]: Same as above.
p. 15-171 [846]: For the mechanism parameter, the phrase "Normally
NULL" should read "Normally the empty string".p. 15-171 [846]: For the chain_bindings parameter, the phrase
"Normally NULL (zero length)" should read "Normally a zero length
octet sequence". -
Reported: SEC 1.5 — Mon, 25 Jan 1999 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SEC 1.6
-
Disposition Summary:
Close issue 2344: More nil/NULL argument that need to be removed:
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SEC16 — More nil/NULL arguments that need to be removed
- Key: SEC16-3
- OMG Task Force: Security 1.6 RTF