SBVR_ — implicit passive form for partitive fact type that uses the verb "includes"

Issue: implicit passive form for partitive fact type that uses the verb
"includes"

To avoid the need to define an explicit Synonymous Form clause of "is
included in" for every partitive fact type that uses the verb "includes",
SBVR Structured English should provide for this as a special, implicit case.

(From the SBVR-FTF telcon of Feb. 2, 2007)

Deferred to the SBVR RTF for the lack of time.
Since there is a workaround of making the passive form of the verb "includes" explicit for each use of it in a verb concept by using the Synonymous Form feature of SBVR Structured English, this deferral to the SBVR RTF will not materially diminish the quality of the SBVR Available Specification.