Legacy Issue Number: 11301
Source: Rule ML Initiative ( Donald Chapin)
The ‘involvement’ Issue is as follows (from my email sent on Saturday):
Issue Submitter’s Name: Donald Chapin
Issue Submitter’s Company: Business Semantics Ltd (submitted as SBVR FTF Chair)
Issue Submitter’s Email: Donald.Chapin@btinternet.com
Issue Name: The Notion of “Involvement” has not been Adequately Specified with in SBVR
Document No: dtc/06/03/01
Document Revision Date: March 2006
Document Version No: —
Page No(s): 16
Nature of Issue: Revision
Severity of Issue: Major
The notion of Involvement has not totally been taken into account by the resolution of Issue 9948 as stated in that resolution.
Several clarifications are needed regarding Involvement such as the nature of instance of roles (see the sum example in the initial 9948 statement).
Reported: SBVR 1.0b2 — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Deferred — SBVR 1.4b2
Deferred to SBVR v1.5 Revision Task Force because the SBVR v1.4 RTF was requested to close before it was finished so the SBVR RTF could be convert to JIRA.
Updated: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:51 GMT
SBVR14 — The Notion of Involvement has not been Adequately Specified with in SBVR
- Key: SBVR14-89
- OMG Task Force: SBVR 1.4 RTF