Legacy Issue Number: 18378
Source: Rule ML Initiative ( John Hall)
Title: SBVR needs a consistently applied policy for styling or not styling signifiers
John Hall, RuleML Initiative
There is some inconsistency in the SBVR specification regarding which signifiers are styled and which are not.
A policy needs to be agreed and applied consistently through the SBVR specification.
1. Style each use of the signifier of a concept (e.g. ‘thing’, ‘meaning’) where that use has the specific meaning defined in its SBVR entry;
2. If the signifier of a defined concept has an everyday English meaning that is different from its SBVR definition, don’t style uses of it where the everyday meaning is intended;
3. Add a paragraph to the introduction explaining the basis for styling/not styling.
Reported: SBVR 1.1 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:00 GMT
Disposition: Deferred — SBVR 1.4b2
Deferred to SBVR v1.5 Revision Task Force because the SBVR v1.4 RTF was requested to close before it was finished so the SBVR RTF could be convert to JIRA.
Updated: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:51 GMT
SBVR14 — styling of signifiers
- Key: SBVR14-4
- OMG Task Force: SBVR 1.4 RTF