-
Key: SBVR14-4
-
Legacy Issue Number: 18378
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Rule ML Initiative ( John Hall)
-
Summary:
Title: SBVR needs a consistently applied policy for styling or not styling signifiers
Source:
John Hall, RuleML Initiative
john.hall@modelsystems.co.uk
Summary:
There is some inconsistency in the SBVR specification regarding which signifiers are styled and which are not.
A policy needs to be agreed and applied consistently through the SBVR specification.
Resolution:
1. Style each use of the signifier of a concept (e.g. ‘thing’, ‘meaning’) where that use has the specific meaning defined in its SBVR entry;
2. If the signifier of a defined concept has an everyday English meaning that is different from its SBVR definition, don’t style uses of it where the everyday meaning is intended;
3. Add a paragraph to the introduction explaining the basis for styling/not styling. -
Reported: SBVR 1.1 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Deferred — SBVR 1.4b2
-
Disposition Summary:
Deferred to SBVR v1.5 Revision Task Force because the SBVR v1.4 RTF was requested to close before it was finished so the SBVR RTF could be convert to JIRA.
-
Updated: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:51 GMT