-
Key: SBVR11-113
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15840
-
Status: closed
-
Source: General Electric ( Mark Linehan)
-
Summary:
Line 58 of the MeaningAndRepresentation-Model.xml file reads as follows:
<ownedMember xmi:type="cmof:Class" name="object type" xmi:id="objectType" superClass="concept"/>
The "superClass" attribute says that an Object Type is a kind of "Concept". This is inconsistent with clause 8.1.1, which defines 'Object Type' as a kind of 'Noun Concept'. This inconsistency causes problems (for example) when populating the "nounConcept=" attribute of the XMI tag <sbvr:closedProjectionDefinesNounConcept> because only a nounConcept can be referenced by this attribute, and an objectType is not a kind of NounConcept.
Proposed resolution:
Change line 58 of the MeaningAndRepresentation-Model.xml file to read:
<ownedMember xmi:type="cmof:Class" name="object type" xmi:id="objectType" superClass="nounConcept"/>
-------------------------------- -
Reported: SBVR 1.0 — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SBVR 1.1
-
Disposition Summary:
Correct the XML file to match the normative text
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SBVR11 — SBVR - Error in MeaningAndRepresentation-Model.xml
- Key: SBVR11-113
- OMG Task Force: SBVR RTF