-
Key: SBVR11-107
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15450
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Trisotech ( Ms. Keri Anderson Healy)
-
Summary:
In 11.2.1 we have an entry for something termed 'fact type role designation' – its definition says that it is a "designation that represents a fact type role and that is not a placeholder " (See diagram, below.) There is nothing beyond a Definition for this concept.
This entry doesn't make sense. I recommend it be dropped. (Or, if someone does see some usefulness for it, then please augment it with some notes and examples.)
-
Reported: SBVR 1.0 — Wed, 8 Sep 2010 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SBVR 1.1
-
Disposition Summary:
Revise the definition of ‘fact type role designation’ and add structural rules, notes and an example. Also, correct a problem in the XML example of a fact type role designation which mistakenly showed the fact type role designation as being a term. A clarification to the representation of multiclassification in models is added.
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT