-
Key: RT11-2
-
Legacy Issue Number: 4350
-
Status: open
-
Source: University of California, Irvine ( Carlos O'Ryan)
-
Summary:
The RT-CORBA specification, even after the FTF modifications
(pt/00-09-02) reads:-----------------------------
4.12.2 Binding of Priority Banded Connection[6th paragraph]
.... Having done this the ORB shall send a "SUCCESS" Reply message. If
the.....-----------------------------
No definition for what form this SUCCESS reply should take. One should
assume that it is a regular GIOP Reply message, with the reply_status set to
NO_EXCEPTION. The spec is at least misleading, should the string "SUCCESS"
be returned? Or should a boolean value of "SUCCESS" be returned? Or just
returning an empty reply is enough?Suggested fixes:
1) Define the _bind_priority_band() [pseudo?-]operation using IDL, that
would at least clarify the contents of all messages, something like the
following:module CORBA {
{ ... .. void _bind_priority_band (); }
// PIDL
interface Object;
2) Change the paragraph to read:
When a Real-Time-ORB receives a _bind_priority_band Request it should
allocateresources to the connection and configure those resources appropriately to
the priorityband indicated in the ServiceContext. Having done this the ORB shall send a
GIOP Replymessage with the reply_status field set to NO_EXCEPTION.
-
Reported: RT 1.0 — Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:15 GMT
RT11 — Ambiguous "SUCCESS" message in RT-CORBA priority bands
- Key: RT11-2
- OMG Task Force: Realtime CORBA 1.1 FTF