-
Key: RMS-57
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15214
-
Status: closed
-
Source: International Business Machines ( Mr. Sridhar Iyengar)
-
Summary:
RMS would be better cast as a MOF model as opposed to a UML model. Using constructs such as Association Classes cause difficulties in export to XMI and transformation to XSD's. (Raised by Sridhar Iyengar of IBM in the Jacksonville meeting)
-
Reported: RMS 1.0b1 — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — RMS 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
We need to have the model remain as a UML model. This is not a metamodel on which models will be based, but is a model itself. The PSM will need to address the issue of Association Class representation in an XSD. That is being worked under Issue 15212
Revised Text: None -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
RMS — RMS would be better cast as a MOF model as opposed to a UML model
- Key: RMS-57
- OMG Task Force: Records Management Services (RMS) FTF