-
Key: QVT-79
-
Legacy Issue Number: 10615
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Model Driven Solutions ( Dr. Edward Willink)
-
Summary:
With – as an OCL comment, ++ seems a very unfortunate choice of operator spelling.
It also has minimal similarity to the C/Java increment operator which is unary.
Please review. The usage seems to always be <big-clause> ++ <tiny>, so how about
just a word.?? <big-clause> 'in' <tiny>
?? <big-clause> 'over' <tiny>
?? <big-clause> 'forall' <tiny> -
Reported: QVT 1.0b1 — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — QVT 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
Resolution: No change
Remark:
Which operator to use is a matter of taste. We checked with a few users and they preferred an operator over a keyword. -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 22:55 GMT