-
Key: PSUM-7
-
Status: closed
-
Source: 88solutions ( Mr. Manfred R. Koethe)
-
Summary:
This issue was actually raised by the designated reviewer form the OMG Architecture Board. His argument was, that "Risk" is too broad for risk resulting from uncertainty.
-
Reported: PSUM 1.0a1 — Wed, 7 Feb 2024 03:37 GMT
-
Disposition: Closed; No Change — PSUM 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
Follow ISO 31000 Guidance
The FTF decided to follow the lead of ISO 31000 and retains the element name "Risk". This is what ISO 31000 says:
ISO 31000 creates a new definition of risk as "the effect of uncertainty on objectives, whether positive or negative." This definition shifts the understanding of risk away from the possibility of a negative outcome and toward the uncertainty itself.ISO 31000 divides risks into three categories, all incurring uncertainty:
- Hazard (if the uncertain event occurs, there will be negative outcomes)
- Control (the results of the uncertainty are themselves uncertain)
- Opportunity (if the uncertain event occurs, there will be positive outcomes)
-
Updated: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:38 GMT
PSUM — Model Element Risk should have a name different from Risk
- Key: PSUM-7
- OMG Task Force: Precise Semantics for Uncertainty Modeling (PSUM) 1.0 FTF