PAGEOM_ — Seven concepts

The Introduction describes that the model is packaged into seven concepts that can be used independently. This is a cool idea. But the oganization of the rest of the spec does not support identification of those seven concepts or how they might be isolated so that can be used independently. Naming of the model subdivisions does not even match the stated concepts. Do these seven concepts raise any conformance issues?

Resolution explanation:

There is a misunderstanding of the wording here, especially what
"standalone" means here. The idea, still valid, is that the PAGE-OM
has several components that can be used independently, on the
conceptual level, but not necessarily on the level when using a
modelling tool.

Resolution:

• Change the text in the last but one paragraph of the Introduction to this:
  To enable PAGE-OM to achieve its goals, it is structured as several high level concepts that can be used independently on the conceptual level (but not necessarily when using a modeling tool). Examples of these concepts are: Marker, Assay, Sample, Genotype, Frequency, Phenotype, and Experiment. For example: A company providing DNA analysis kits might only need to use the Marker and Assay parts of this model.