ODM11 — rdfs:Literal

Need capability to say that the type of a property, when specified without an explicit domain or range, an alternative to an anonymous class might be rdfs:Literal
The statement is made that the profile uses an anonymous class, analagous to owl:Thing ..., which is only appropriate if the user intends the property to be an object property in OWL. For completeness, include rdfs:Literal to support datatype properties as well.

Revise the text under Description in section 14.1.7.1 as follows.
In the second sentence of the second paragraph, which begins, “For RDF properties that are defined without specifying a domain or range,” change
…”the profile uses an anonymous class (analogous to owl:Thing in OWL ontologies) for the “missing” end class.
to
…”the profile allows users to
• use an anonymous UML::Class, stereotyped by «rdfsClass», that is either the RDFS library class representing rdfs:Resource (analogous to owl:Thing in OWL ontologies) or rdfs:Class, for the “missing” domain end class, and
• either of those options or a UML::Datatype, stereotyped by «rdfsDatatype», library element representing rdfs:Literal, as appropriate, for the “missing” range end class.