-
Key: OCL24-4
-
Legacy Issue Number: 17463
-
Status: closed
-
Source: computer.org ( DI Florin Ioan Chertes)
-
Summary:
The navigation from Association Classes does not conform to UML 2.4.1 because of 7.3.4 AssociationClass on page 44 UML Superstructure Specification, v2.4.1. the kind of navigation allowed by OCL is not allowed by UML, i.e. the navigation from the association class to the ends of the association is explicitly not allowed by UML but allowed by OCL. I see here a contradiction. I checked UML 2.1.2 from 2007 and in that UML this navigation from the association class the ends of the association was still allowed. I think that OCL 2.3.1 is not compatible with UML 2.4.2 from this point of view. Please tell me if this opinion is correct. If this contradiction that I remarked really exists than what to expect from the future: OCL or UML point of view?
-
Reported: OCL 2.3.1 — Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — OCL 2.4
-
Disposition Summary:
The apparent prohibition in UML 2.4.1 is not present in UML 2.5 Beta.
The problem is a misunderstanding. OCL expressions are resolved at 'modeling-time' against the model and so are not restricted by visibility or any practical limitations that may occur at run-time.
Disposition: Closed, no change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT
OCL24 — Navigation from Association Classes does not conform to UML 2.4.1
- Key: OCL24-4
- OMG Task Force: 2nd OCL 2.4 RTF