Legacy Issue Number: 2660
Summary: I think we all agree that the following stringified names are syntax errors:
That is to ensure that there is only a single representation of empty
id and kind fields. In other words, the above names are correctly expressed
It occurred to me that we have a related problem with empty kind fields.
For example, the following two strings appear to denote the same
In other words, the spec isn"t clear whether the trailing dot is permitted.
Reported: NAM 1.0b1 — Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — NAM 1.0
Original submission intention is for a name to have a single valid stringified representation. Clar
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT