NAM 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

NAM — Illegal Examples

  • Key: NAM-33
  • Legacy Issue Number: 3091
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    The Sep 01 revision of the INS document (99-09-01) twice shows example
    URLs (on page 3-4 and 3-7) that are illegal according to the grammar on
    page 3-5. The example on page 3-4 reads

    corbaloc:iiop://1.1@555xyz.com/Prod/TradingService

    However, the grammar allows either the <iiop_default> string `//' or
    the <iiop_prot_token> `iiop', but not both. A valid URL can therefore
    never contain a <iiop_prot_addr> that starts in `iiop://'.

    So what's correct, the example or the grammar?

  • Reported: NAM 1.0b1 — Sat, 4 Dec 1999 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — NAM 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Typo / Not an Issue

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:37 GMT