Legacy Issue Number: 3091
The Sep 01 revision of the INS document (99-09-01) twice shows example
URLs (on page 3-4 and 3-7) that are illegal according to the grammar on
page 3-5. The example on page 3-4 reads
However, the grammar allows either the <iiop_default> string `//' or
the <iiop_prot_token> `iiop', but not both. A valid URL can therefore
never contain a <iiop_prot_addr> that starts in `iiop://'.
So what's correct, the example or the grammar?
Reported: NAM 1.0b1 — Sat, 4 Dec 1999 05:00 GMT
Disposition: Closed; No Change — NAM 1.0
Typo / Not an Issue
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:37 GMT