-
Key: KERML_-165
-
Status: open
-
Source: The MathWorks ( Mr. Alan Moore)
-
Summary:
In section 8.3.2.4.5 - the spec says
{redefines memberName}
A Namespace can provide names for its members via the memberNames and memberShortNames specified by the Memberships in the Namespace.
However, the only subclass of Membership, OwningMembership redefines memberName, thus:
8.3.2.4.8:
/ownedMemberName : String [0..1]Presumably this means that effectively memberName must equal ownedMemberName in OwningMembership.
There is no constraint to this effect and i can see it would be tricky, give the redefinition.
I wonder whether the metamodel needs a bit of surgery, given that the majority of Memberships are OwningMemberships and therefore have this issue. -
Reported: KerML 1.0b2 — Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:56 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:07 GMT
KERML_ — Use of memberName in OwningMembership
- Key: KERML_-165
- OMG Task Force: Kernel Modeling Language (KerML) 1.0 FTF 2