-
Key: KERML11-111
-
Status: open
-
Source: Emerson ( Kent Johnson)
-
Summary:
1. Page 93: s.isSufficient
2. Page 102: e.ownedRelationship (TWICE!)The s. and e. parts were unexpected to me, especially since everywhere else we have isSufficient and ownedRelationship without those prefixes. I suspect they slipped in incorrectly?
-
Reported: KerML 1.0 — Sun, 2 Nov 2025 21:21 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 04:12 GMT
KERML11 — Incorrect prefix in "s.isSufficient" and "e.ownedRelationship"
- Key: KERML11-111
- OMG Task Force: Kernel Modeling Language (KerML) 1.1 RTF