IEFRA2 — Weaknesses & Gaps sec 1.7

"7.3 Weaknesses & Gaps
● Too vague and lacks explanation
● No context for why assumptions matter
● Misses an opportunity to introduce key themes
Suggest: Provide context—explains why assumptions are important in an RA. Introduce key themes—prepares the reader for subsections 1.7.1 - 1.7.5. Link assumptions to IEF-RA’s mission—ensures clarity in how they shape the framework.

""The following assumptions govern the development of this reference architecture and define the foundational conditions under which the IEF-RA operates. These assumptions help establish the boundaries of the framework, ensuring alignment with real-world operational requirements, policy enforcement mechanisms, and data security needs.
The assumptions outlined in the following sections address key architectural principles, including data-centric security, interoperability vs. integration, policy-based enforcement, and handling of metadata and complex conditions. By explicitly defining these assumptions, the IEF-RA provides a structured foundation that supports scalable, adaptable, and mission-critical information-sharing environments."""