-
Key: I2JAV11-54
-
Legacy Issue Number: 1143
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: Chapter 9.8.1
Says "Local stubs are defined to be direct base classes of remote stubs"
Does it matter? It is the opposite way as proposed in the drawing in
chapter 6.4MORE FAR-FETCHED IDEA
What if the Operations interface would not contain the inheritance
relationship? Wouldn"t that be a step in the direction of being able
to implement independent interfaces with one class. (To be
functional this would need matching changes in the tie class) -
Reported: I2JAV 1.0b1 — Thu, 16 Apr 1998 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — I2JAV 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
closed issue
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
I2JAV11 — Chapter 9.8.1 Local stubs-bug
- Key: I2JAV11-54
- OMG Task Force: IDL to Java December 2000 RTF