I2JAV11 — Problem with IDL --> Java mapping for Unions

Summary: I have found what appears to be a short coming of the IDL to Java
mapping for unions.
Reading the CORBA V2.0 (July 1995) on pages 3-23 and 3-24 it indicates
unions can have a value of the discriminator where there is not a case
that matches the discriminator. The Trader Service specification has a
great example of when this may be needed (in fact we are following this
pattern in PIDS). The Java mapping for unions does not have a method or constructor for
setting the discriminator when the discriminator does not correspond to
at least one case label.

closed issue