FUML_ — Corrections to previous resolutions

The resolution text for the following fUML issues had minor errors and inconsistencies. The following points reflect the correct interpretation for changes to be made to the specification according to these resolutions.

Issue 13435: Type "instanceVistor" for "instanceVisitor" occurs in a number of places, but not in any of the revised code snippets. The correct spelling is “instanceVisitor”.
Issue 14545: The revised code includes "super.isReady" instead of "super.isReady()", which is clearly a syntax error. The correct code is “super.isReady()”.
Issue 14550: The resolution refers to changing "Behavior::isReentrant" in Subclause 7.3.2.2.4, while the correct Behavior subclause is actually 7.3.2.2.1.
Issue 14550: The resolution says to add an operation "countOfferedValues" to the class ObjectNodeActivation, but then refers to this operation in one place later as "countTotalValues". The correct operation name is “countOfferedValues”.
Issue 14618: The revised text section of the resolution refers to “Subclause 8.6.2.2.15, ObjectNodeActivation”, whereas the ccorrect ObjectNodeActivation subclause is 8.5.2.2.15 (as given in the issue summary).

Agreed.