EDOC — Editorial issue, restructuring of the specification

I have an editorial issue with the "UML Profile for EDOC"
specification: It needs some restructuring to make it usable:

The title is misleading, as the specification contains a number if
chapters that have UML profiles, and a number that have MOF
models. Some have both.

Chapters 2 and 3 of "UML Profile for EDOC" - loosely - "ECA" are
difficult to read, as they intersperse MOF models with UML profiles
for each sub-package of ECA. In addition, Section 6 of chapter 3
is the "Relationships Profile", which is unrelated, and should be
a separate chapter. Also, Chapter 5 of the EDOC spec contains 2
separate models.

Suggested resolution - each chapter (and some sections) become
contiguous chapters in the OMG modelling specifications with
appropriate titles.

"UML Profile for EDOC" specification should become 6 contiguous
chapters of OMG Modelling specifications:

• Chapter N "Enterprise Collaboration Architecture Metamodel"
  comprises:
  . EDOC Chapter 2, Section 3 as a preamble
  . EDOC Chapter 3 Sections 1, 2.0-2.3, 2.5, 3.0-3.3, 4.0-4.2,
  4.4-4.6, 5.0-5.2, 5.4-5.6

• Chapter N+1 "UML Profile for Enterprise Collaboration
  Architecture" comprises:
  . EDOC Chapter 3 Sections 2.4, 3.4, 4.3, 5.3

• Chapter N+2 "UML Profile for Relationships" comprises:
  . EDOC Chapter 3 Section 6

• Chapter N+3 "UML Profile for Patterns" == EDOC Chapter 4

• Chapter N+4 "EJB and Java Metamodels" == EDOC Chapter 5 Section 1

• Chapter N+5 "Flow Composition Metamodel" == EDOC Chapter 5 Section 2

close as duplicate