EDOC 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

EDOC — Ch 3: p 58: Why do we need initiating role and responding role?

Open Closed All
  • Key: EDOC-23
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5824
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    7. Ch 3: p 58: Why do we need initiating role and responding role? They seem to just define a name, whose main purpose seems to be to designate one of the ports of that protocol as being initiator. Why not just have 2 associations to two distinguished ports?
  • Reported: EDOC 1.0b1 — Mon, 13 Jan 2003 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — EDOC 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    The following removes these classes from the model
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT