-
Key: DOL-35
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mrs. Elisa F. Kendall)
-
Summary:
In the DOL ontology, dol:Union is defined in terms of the combination of all ..., and then refers to a sequence of OMS. Is the sequence order actually relevant? If not, would it be better to define this through a set of OMS rather than a sequence?
-
Reported: DOL 1.0b1 — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:28 GMT
-
Disposition: Closed; No Change — DOL 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
No change
Sequence is used here in the sense of syntactic sequence. Since a union is a syntactic entity, we would prefer to stay with sequence here.
-
Updated: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 18:07 GMT