DOL 1.0 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

DOL — The definition of union is misleading

  • Key: DOL-35
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mrs. Elisa F. Kendall)
  • Summary:

    In the DOL ontology, dol:Union is defined in terms of the combination of all ..., and then refers to a sequence of OMS. Is the sequence order actually relevant? If not, would it be better to define this through a set of OMS rather than a sequence?

  • Reported: DOL 1.0b1 — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:28 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — DOL 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    No change

    Sequence is used here in the sense of syntactic sequence. Since a union is a syntactic entity, we would prefer to stay with sequence here.

  • Updated: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 18:07 GMT