DMNFTF — boxed (tabular) expressions should be encouraged

last paragraph of 6.1 of the alpha spec says:

Using a value expression of type invocation is never required, even when possible: FEEL specifies its own invocation mechanism for more complex usages, and a FEEL literal expression can always be used instead of a value expression of type invocation.

I would like this to say instead:

A boxed invocation SHOULD be used instead of a literal FEEL invocation when possible. In general, a boxed expression SHOULD be used instead of a literal FEEL expression when possible. Note that Conformance Level 3 specifies additional boxed expressions.

Because 'boxed expression' isn't defined until 6.2, the rewritten para should be moved to the end of 6.2 (or even 6.3)

Also, I notice that 6.1 defines a decision table to be a tabular representation of decision logic. Would it be a good idea to do a global replace of 'boxed expression' with 'tabular expression'?

Define boxed expressions available at each conformance level, and recommend their use over equivalent literal expressions.