-
Key: DDSXTY_-22
-
Legacy Issue Number: 17021
-
Status: closed
-
Source: ModelFoundry ( Sam Mancarella [X] (Inactive))
-
Summary:
The following figures exhibit inconsistent application of data types to attributes, operations and parameters:
Figure 4
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 16
Figure 26
Figure 30
Figure 33
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39Certain attributes/parameters have 'int' or 'string' applied which conflict the data types defined within the aforementioned model, and the PrimitiveTypes defined in UML. What is the intent with these? Which set of primitive data types are intended for application here (IDL? Java, C++, UML, XTypes?)
For example, the 'Enumeration' class in Figure 10 defines a 'bit-bound' property of type int.
-
Reported: DDS-XTypes 1.0b2 — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — DDS-XTypes 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
Use DDS-XTypes types consistently. Note that Figures 9 and 16 are already correct—they use the DDS-XTypes-derived basic types, not the UML-built-in ones.
Note that if the resolution to issue #16561 is accepted, the modification to figure 38 will be irrelevant, because the corresponding section of the document will be removed. -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:48 GMT
DDSXTY_ — Conflicting data types applied to several Attributes, Operations and Parameters in UML notation
- Key: DDSXTY_-22
- OMG Task Force: 2nd Extensible and Dynamic Topic Types for DDS FTF