-
Key: DDSIRTP22-4
-
Legacy Issue Number: 11072
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Real-Time Innovations ( Mr. Kenneth Brophy)
-
Summary:
Source:
Real-Time Innovations, Inc. (Ken Brophy, ken@rti.com)
Summary:
For better performance and simpler reliability, a liveliness heartbeat should be allowed to be a liveliness-only message without heartbeat semantics. As subclassed from a heartbeat, a liveliness heartbeat may trigger an ACKNACK response; to be a liveliness-only message, no ACKNACKs should be triggered. To enable this, setting the final flag should not trigger ACKNACKs.Resolution:
A liveliness heartbeat with final-flag set must not trigger any ACKNACKs.Revised Text:
Append to 8.4.2.3.2:The response is not required when a liveliness HEARTBEAT has both liveliness and final flags set to indicate it is a liveliness-only message.
Revise statechart 8.24:
-
Reported: DDSI-RTPS 2.0b1 — Fri, 25 May 2007 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — DDSI-RTPS 2.2
-
Disposition Summary:
This issue was already resolved as part of the FTF, in that report it is labeled as
issue 11043. It appears that a typographical mistake was made in the report (or else
something changed in the database) so that the issue was not closed in the OMG
database.
Revised Text:
Disposition: NoChange -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
DDSIRTP22 — Interpreting Liveliness Heartbeats
- Key: DDSIRTP22-4
- OMG Task Force: Data Distribution Interoperability 2.2 RTF