- 
                            Key: DDSIRTP22-4
- 
                            Legacy Issue Number: 11072
- 
                            Status: closed
- 
                            Source: Real-Time Innovations ( Mr. Kenneth Brophy)
- 
                            Summary:Source: 
 Real-Time Innovations, Inc. (Ken Brophy, ken@rti.com)
 Summary:
 For better performance and simpler reliability, a liveliness heartbeat should be allowed to be a liveliness-only message without heartbeat semantics. As subclassed from a heartbeat, a liveliness heartbeat may trigger an ACKNACK response; to be a liveliness-only message, no ACKNACKs should be triggered. To enable this, setting the final flag should not trigger ACKNACKs.Resolution: 
 A liveliness heartbeat with final-flag set must not trigger any ACKNACKs.Revised Text: 
 Append to 8.4.2.3.2:The response is not required when a liveliness HEARTBEAT has both liveliness and final flags set to indicate it is a liveliness-only message. Revise statechart 8.24: 
- 
                            Reported: DDSI-RTPS 2.0b1 — Fri, 25 May 2007 04:00 GMT
- 
                            Disposition: Resolved — DDSI-RTPS 2.2
- 
                            Disposition Summary:This issue was already resolved as part of the FTF, in that report it is labeled as 
 issue 11043. It appears that a typographical mistake was made in the report (or else
 something changed in the database) so that the issue was not closed in the OMG
 database.
 Revised Text:
 Disposition: NoChange
- 
                            Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
DDSIRTP22 — Interpreting Liveliness Heartbeats
- Key: DDSIRTP22-4
- OMG Task Force: Data Distribution Interoperability 2.2 RTF