Legacy Issue Number: 14209
Source: Remedy IT ( Johnny Willemsen)
I got this questions from one of our users. I think it would be a good thing
to standardize the IDL filenames where the dds ports are defined in to get
interoperability in the user code. What are the ideas of others on this?
> Are the headers to include in idl to get dds4ccm capabilities
> standardized? My guess is no. I need to include more than
> components.idl to get definitions. Do we need to raise this with omg?
Reported: DDS4CCM 1.0b1 — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — DDS4CCM 1.0b2
Give the name “ccm_dds.idl” to the idl file.
Updated: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 00:50 GMT
DDS4CCM_ — Dds4ccm and includes
- Key: DDS4CCM_-77
- OMG Task Force: DDS for CCM FTF 2