-
Key: DDS15-36
-
Legacy Issue Number: 12276
-
Status: open
-
Source: lmco.com ( Abdullah Sowayan)
-
Summary:
noticed an inconsistency while I was reading the DDS spec (version 1.2) last night. My question relates to the following quality of service policy: DURABILITYSERVICE_POLICY_NAME
The pattern in all QoS names is:
*_QOS_POLICY_NAME, except for the DURABILITYSERVICE
The pattern in all QoS IDs is:
*_QOS_POLICY_ID
The DURABILITYSERVICE does adhere to the pattern/convention for Qos IDs:
DURABILITYSERVICE_QOS_POLICY_ID
But the does NOT adhere to the pattern/convention for Qos names. So, is there a typo in DURABILITYSERVICE_POLICY_NAME, i.e., should it be DURABILITYSERVICE_QOS_POLICY_NAME, or is the lacking of 'QOS' intentional?
-
Reported: DDS 1.2 — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:18 GMT
DDS15 — DURABILITYSERVICE_POLICY_NAME
- Key: DDS15-36
- OMG Task Force: Data Distribution Service 1.5 RTF