-
Key: CPP13-48
-
Legacy Issue Number: 3673
-
Status: open
-
Source: Objective Interface Systems ( Mr. Bill Beckwith)
-
Summary:
I believe that the CORBA::release and CORBA::is_nil
functions that take a POA_ptr argument do not
reference the proper scope:1.41.11 release and is_nil
{ ... void release(POA_ptr); ... Boolean is_nil(POA_ptr); ... }
// C++
namespace CORBAShould be:
1.41.11 release and is_nil
{ ... void release(PortableServer::POA_ptr); ... Boolean is_nil(PortableServer::POA_ptr); ... }
// C++
namespace CORBAI don't see in the specification where the scope
of POA_ptr is explicitly defined. But, I believe
that the correct definition of POA_ptr is in the
PortableServer namespace (i.e. the enclosing scope
of the POA class).Then again I can't find anything in the specification
that asserts that any Foo_ptr type must go in the
immediately enclosing class or namespace containing
the Foo type. :-/Also, if POA_ptr is in PortableServer when an ORB is
mapping of modules to classes the definition of the
above release and is_nil functions in the CORBA class
will be impossible.So I feel compelled to ask:
Do we really need to have release and is_nil functions
for types outside of the CORBA module? -
Reported: CPP 1.1 — Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT