-
Key: CORBA35-410
-
Legacy Issue Number: 1256
-
Status: open
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: p.6.68: It is a bit awkward that boxed values of "complex" types map
all to the same type (i.e., as for typedefs, the value"s name appears
only in holder/helper classes), and that each boxed value of "basic" type
maps to its individual class. Instead, boxed values of basic types
could map to the corresponding java.lang.* class, e.g.
java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Short, etc. An issue with this approach
is that java.lang.Short and java.lang.Byte are not defined in JDK
1.0.2. I doubt however this JDK is still much in use; for its users,
short and octet could optionally map to e.g. CORBA.ShortValue and
CORBA.ByteValue (inspired from CORBA::StringValue). -
Reported: CORBA 2.2 — Tue, 28 Apr 1998 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 20:55 GMT
CORBA35 — p.6.68 boxed values of complex types map to same type
- Key: CORBA35-410
- OMG Task Force: CORBA 3.5 RTF