-
Key: CORBA35-215
-
Legacy Issue Number: 961
-
Status: open
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: in section 4.9.2 last paragraph:
"Such a ProxyPushSupplier is guaranteed only to invoke operations defined in
interface I. Any event on the channel that does not correspond to an
operation defined in interface I is NOT passed on to the consumer. Such a
ProxyPushSupplier is therefore an event filter based on type".My question is: if we have this proxy to block generic calls (push() in this
case) why does TypedPushConsumer inherit CosEventComm::PushConsumer, whish does
support push() ? Why should the generic calls like push() be blocked anyway
if (according to 4.7.1) TypedPushConsumer should support both typed and generic
models ?Is there something I am misunderstanding ?
-
Reported: CORBA 2.2 — Thu, 5 Feb 1998 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:56 GMT