CORBA34 — Sections 5.3.1.2 vs. 6.3.1: Mapping of non-public state to java private

Summary: Section 5.3.1.2 says that non-public data members should be mapped
so that "the private part of the state is only accessible to the
implementation code and the marshaling routines."

Section 6.3.1 says that non-public data members are mapped to
private instance variables.

The problem is that the Java marshaling routines are in the Helper
class, which cannot see private instance variables in the value class.

The proposed solution is to modify the Java mapping to map the default
IDL state to the default (package visibility) Java state instead of
private.

Deferred

This proposal was generated automatically by request of the Task Force Chair Adam Mitz.