Legacy Issue Number: 5518
Source: Raytheon ( Jerry Bickle)
Propertyfile clarification is needed for consistent behavior.
The only statement made about propertyfile is that the implementation's
has precedence over the same propertyfile types at the softpkg level. Why
multiple property files needed at the softpkg and implementation levels? If
one propertfile exist at any level, which property file has precedence in
the list? If
multiple property files exists are they merged together? Are the softpkg's
element property files merge with the softpkg property files and which one
precedence? Are the implementation's descriptor property files merge with
implementation property files, and which one has precedence? Are
property files merge with the softpkg property files?
Reported: CORBA 3.0 — Wed, 17 Jul 2002 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Deferred — CORBA 3.4
This proposal was generated automatically by request of the Task Force Chair Adam Mitz.
Updated: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:47 GMT