- 
                            Key: CORBA26-61
- 
                            Legacy Issue Number: 4080
- 
                            Status: closed
- 
                            Source: Iconixx ( Thomas Hawker)
- 
                            Summary:The definition of homes does not permit interface inheritance. It 
 appears this is an oversight as the omission seems unreasonable and
 counter-intuitive, especially since homes must follow a parallel
 derivation hierarchy with their component types. I have found cases in
 which a home would expose the same interface as its component in which
 the home subsequently delegates to a specific component instance (even a
 persistent instance) however selected. (The component instance may or
 may not be hidden from the client.) Interfaces are a perfect mechanism
 whereby the operational signatures could be standardized, thus
 eliminating potential errors caused by changing one but not the other.
 This could be accomplished using a supports clause in the inheritance
 specification similar to that of valuetypes.
- 
                            Reported: CORBA 2.4.1 — Fri, 24 Nov 2000 05:00 GMT
- 
                            Disposition: Resolved — CORBA 2.6.1
- 
                            Disposition Summary:see below 
- 
                            Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT