-
Key: BACM-84
-
Status: open
-
Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( James Rhyne)
-
Summary:
The beta specification states that SMOF is a requirement for implementors. However, SMOF lifts the MOF restriction that each instance have one and only one metaclass/meta-association. Consequently, the specification is ambiguous about what elements should be disjoint. Some meta-classes should be disjoint (e.g. business objects and capabilities).
This omission also affects the issues raised inBACM-83. -
Reported: BACM 1.0a1 — Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:11 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 17 May 2023 00:01 GMT
-
Attachments:
- BACM-83_BACM-84_Background.docx 16 kB (application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
- BACM_Model_20230429.docx 1.02 MB (application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
BACM — Beta specification ambiguous with respect to SMOF
- Key: BACM-84
- OMG Task Force: Business Architecture Core Metamodel (BACM) 1.0 FTF