BACM — The 3rd paragraph of 7.2 is unclear

This paragraph states:
"In general, metamodel classes in the diagrams in this document will become meta-classes (class prototypes or templates) in an implementation. However, classes stereotyped as “association” will become associationclasses. These entities are binary or n-ary associations that can be specialized (from other meta-associationclasses), have features, and participate in other associations. UML binary associations with a <<class>> stereotype should be implemented as binary meta-associationclasses."
This description is unclear. It mentions association classes that are not part of MOF. It does not adequately describe how to interpret the stereotypes <<class>>, <<association>>, <<shortcut>> and <<individual>>

Attached file replaces 7.2.1 para3 et seq

The description of the translation to MOF is completely rewritten and all paragraphs of section 7.2.1 starting with paragraph 3 are replaced by the attached Word document content.