-
Key: BACM-20
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mr. James Rhyne)
-
Summary:
There seems no attempt to meet requirement 6.5.2.4 “Submitters shall identify shared terms and clarify any differences in definitions in UPDM/UAF, VDML, ArchiMate™, TOGAF Content Metamodel, BPMN, DMN, and CMMN.“
-
Reported: BACM 1.0a1 — Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:31 GMT
-
Disposition: Duplicate or Merged — BACM 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
This issue should be merged with
BACM-6BACM-7(a proposal to resolveBACM-6) which has been adopted by vote, proposes to remove Section 9 from the specification. Another issue has been recorded to publish the Section 9 content and other material as informative guidance. There are no proposals at this time to resolve this issue. -
Updated: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:56 GMT
BACM — Failure to meet RFP requirement 6.5.2.4 regarding specification alignment
- Key: BACM-20
- OMG Task Force: Business Architecture Core Metamodel (BACM) 1.0 FTF