BACM 1.0b2 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

BACM — Failure to meet RFP requirement regarding specification alignment

  • Key: BACM-20
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mr. James Rhyne)
  • Summary:

    There seems no attempt to meet requirement “Submitters shall identify shared terms and clarify any differences in definitions in UPDM/UAF, VDML, ArchiMate™, TOGAF Content Metamodel, BPMN, DMN, and CMMN.“

  • Reported: BACM 1.0a1 — Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:31 GMT
  • Disposition: Duplicate or Merged — BACM 1.0b2
  • Disposition Summary:

    This issue should be merged with BACM-6

    BACM-7 (a proposal to resolve BACM-6) which has been adopted by vote, proposes to remove Section 9 from the specification. Another issue has been recorded to publish the Section 9 content and other material as informative guidance. There are no proposals at this time to resolve this issue.

  • Updated: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:56 GMT