BACM 1.0b2 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

BACM — No glossary in the package descriptions

Open Closed All
  • Key: BACM-19
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mr. James Rhyne)
  • Summary:

    There is no Glossary in the perspectives as required in 6.5.2.2 of the RFP: only a combined glossary of camelcased metaclass names.
  • Reported: BACM 1.0a1 — Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:25 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — BACM 1.0b2
  • Disposition Summary:

    The Glossary in Annex A is deemed sufficient

    It is possible to read the RFP as requiring a glossary for each domain of the metamodel. However, this was not the understanding of the RFP writers and no issue was raised during the RFP issuance. The specification provides a required glossary in Annex A.
  • Updated: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:56 GMT