-
Key: ALMAS14-7
-
Status: closed
-
Source: BAE SYSTEMS ( Mr. Simon Mettrick)
-
Summary:
The formatting of tables for operations for interface classes doesn't aid readability
-
Reported: ALMAS 1.1 — Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:04 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — ALMAS 1.4b1
-
Disposition Summary:
Insert Extra Whitespace
The tables are difficult to read particularly because long parameter lists are on the same logical line. The document has consequently adjusted the width of columns 1 & 2 to be large, leading to a very narrow column for the summaries in some tables.
For Operation Tables in sections 6.1 & 6.3
Newline characters should be inserted:- between the operation name and the opening parenthesis in column 1
- before the opening square bracket around parameters in column 2
- after the closing square bracket around parameters in column 2
- after each comma separating parameters in column 2
Additional spaces are after commas between parameters should be removed from column 2
Column widths should be adjusted to maximise the width of column 3 (summary) subject to not breaking individual words/identifiers across a line in columns 1 & 2
-
Updated: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:40 GMT
-
Attachments:
- ALMAS v1.4#7.odt 1.01 MB (application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
ALMAS14 — Operation tables for interfaces aren't easy to read
- Key: ALMAS14-7
- OMG Task Force: Alert Management Service (ALMAS) 1.4 RTF