- 
                            Key: ALMAS14-7
- 
                            Status: closed
- 
                            Source: BAE SYSTEMS ( Mr. Simon Mettrick)
- 
                            Summary:The formatting of tables for operations for interface classes doesn't aid readability 
- 
                            Reported: ALMAS 1.1 — Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:04 GMT
- 
                            Disposition: Resolved — ALMAS 1.4b1
- 
                            Disposition Summary:Insert Extra Whitespace The tables are difficult to read particularly because long parameter lists are on the same logical line. The document has consequently adjusted the width of columns 1 & 2 to be large, leading to a very narrow column for the summaries in some tables. For Operation Tables in sections 6.1 & 6.3 
 Newline characters should be inserted:- between the operation name and the opening parenthesis in column 1
- before the opening square bracket around parameters in column 2
- after the closing square bracket around parameters in column 2
- after each comma separating parameters in column 2
 Additional spaces are after commas between parameters should be removed from column 2
 Column widths should be adjusted to maximise the width of column 3 (summary) subject to not breaking individual words/identifiers across a line in columns 1 & 2
 
- 
                            Updated: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:40 GMT
- 
                            Attachments:- ALMAS v1.4#7.odt 1.01 MB (application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
 
ALMAS14 — Operation tables for interfaces aren't easy to read
- Key: ALMAS14-7
- OMG Task Force: Alert Management Service (ALMAS) 1.4 RTF