-
Key: ABPSC-63
-
Status: open
-
Source: 88solutions ( Mr. Manfred R. Koethe)
-
Summary:
Splitting the finalization process into FTF and FTF-2 (as separate taskforces) is highly counter-productive. In many FTFs, JIRA and other electronic tools are used to organize, control, and facilitate the finalization process. This includes interactive discussions and design work to reach the best solution in collaborative work of the FTF members. Splitting this continuous work arbitrarily into two logistically separate task forces at the 14 months mark is damaging for the efficiency of this process. It would be much favorable to have ONE FTF, with constant membership and constant work environment throughout the whole finalization process. A checkpoint and intermediate reporting shall be introduced after 14 months, and the extension to 24 months shall be dependent on AB endorsement of the checkpoint report, and TC vote.
This scheme preserves the timing idea of FTF/FTF-2, but preserves the continuous work environment for the FTF. -
Reported: ABPSC 3.3 — Tue, 20 Feb 2024 02:12 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:21 GMT
ABPSC — Reform Finalization Process - No separate FTF and FTF-2
- Key: ABPSC-63
- OMG Task Force: AB Process Subcommittee